Genesis performed by the Milwaukee Ballet
When the brochure for the Milwaukee Ballet’s 2012-13 season arrived last year I came across Genesis in the line-up. An International Choreographic Competition, I knew it was something I wanted to see. I was curious to discover what up and coming choreographers were creating. For months I waited for this event. Finally, this past weekend, it arrived.
The
competition featured three different choreographers. Each created a segment of dance about twenty
minutes long. All had their own story,
costumes, lighting, music, and dancers.
There were two awards the choreographers had a chance to win. First was the one chosen by a panel
judges. The other was the Audience Favorite
Award which was decided by the audience.
After every performance, the audience was asked to vote for their
favorite segment. As all three works were
quite different from each other, I was very interested to see the results of
the voting.
Even
though I had a favorite segment, I found something positive about each
one. The first work I saw was “Biorhythm”
choreographed by James Gregg. This piece
had my favorite costumes. The costumes
throughout all the works were simple.
What made me like Mr. Gregg’s more was they had a bit extra detail. The back of the tops the women wore had
laces, or something to that effect. It
was a nice extra design element to have with otherwise basic costume pieces. Part way through the segment trench coats
were added. While the trench coats were
worn, a fluidity was created which softened the otherwise intentionally jagged
movements.
The
second work was Gabrielle Lamb’s “Manifold”.
The dancers in this one got into some really interesting poses. It often felt as though I was watching
dancing yoga. That is how contorted
things seemed at times. I do not know if
yoga was one of Ms. Lamb’s influences, but it was really interesting to
see. What I also liked was watching the
dancers become an object. During one
part of the work many of the dancers came together to create a human
vehicle. This vehicle carried another
dancer on stage and then off again when his part was done. While the dancer was on it, he worked with
another to make it appear as though he was pedaling and moving the vehicle
himself. That was a really good effect.
Lauren
Edson’s “I Hit the Ground” was the last work I watched. This one was the most classical of the three
entries. I would say it was classical
with a bit of a modern twist. A lot of
the poses had harder edges than I am used to seeing. They were a lot more rigid and angular. The steps and fluid movements that went with
the hard poses is where the classical ballet elements came in. I liked seeing how the two different thoughts
were put together. Also with this work,
the story was clearer than the other two. Based on their movements, I felt I understood
the relationships between the dancers.
The music choices helped with this understanding as well.
One
of my favorite things about the performance had nothing to do with the dancers
or choreographers at all. While I waited
for one of the segments to begin, I discovered the lighting designer, Jason
Fassl, had a profile in the event’s program.
I think this is fantastic. All
too often the people behind the scenes get forgotten. I am really happy Mr. Fassl was not this
time. Especially since the lighting was
such a huge part of each work. Without a
physical set, the lighting created the set for the dancers. Lighting is hard enough on its own. To have it serve as both lighting and set, I
imagine that must have been a challenge.
I am glad Mr. Fassl got the credit he deserved.
As I mentioned earlier, there were two awards that could be received. The one awarded by the judges went to Gabrielle Lamb for “Manifold.” Lauren Edson received the Audience Favorite Award for “I Hit the Ground”. I want to say congratulations to all three of the choreographers, and everyone else involved with the production. Everyone did a great job and I hope to see this competition again.
Comments