Inherit the Wind

It’s funny how a movie from 1960 set in the 1920s can so resemble today. The fight for the freedom to think and learn remains strong. With it, we are fighting people who believe their own religious beliefs are the right beliefs and should supersede all others. It is a war being waged on so many levels, topics, and rights today. Which leads me to asking, as some feel they should be allowed to ban books, hinder reproductive rights, and stop marriage rights because of their own personal religious beliefs, do we really want to go back to the same thoughts and mentalities from one hundred years ago?

DVD cover of the film Inherit the Wind. Drawn pictures of the stars. Two of the four people are older men facing each other in argument. A younger man holds a young woman in his arms.
Inherit the Wind
Spencer Tracy, Fredric March, Dick York, Donna Anderson

Cates is arrested for his beliefs

Bertram T. Cates (Dick York) has been arrested. He was not only arrested, but an entire production was made of it.

Led by Reverend Jeremiah Brown (Claude Akins), a group of townsmen arrived in Cates’s classroom with a photojournalist. They interrupted his lesson, planted the camera in front of him, and took pictures of him as he got arrested. Cates’s crime? Teaching Darwin’s theory of evolution.

It is against the law to teach about evolution. Therefore, Cates is arrested and put into jail.

Cates’s arrest gains attention from around the country. Concerned about the attention, the townsmen—and I do mean men because women weren’t at this meeting or probably any others—get together and wonder if this trial should go forward. (Maybe they shouldn’t have brought the photojournalist if they wanted to keep this situation quiet.)

The case is now being referred to in the papers as “The Monkey Trial.” Some believe this will harm the reputation of the town. A banker is particularly concerned. Because if the town has a bad reputation, banks from around the country may no longer want to do business with him.

Others believe the attention is proving that their town is taking a stand. Doing what is right for all mankind. This trial is going to show everyone just who they are. Now that they have former politician and renowned religious man Matthew Harrison Brady (Fredric March) working for the prosecution, there is no stopping them. The trial will go forward.

The prosecution and defense arrive

Brady arrives in town with a lot of fanfare. The town stands strongly behind him, celebrating that religion has come to town to eliminate the “evil” Darwin. Even the governor of the state is thrilled to have Brady help with the trial. He honors Brady with the rank of colonel for the state militia. Brady is the man everyone loves. When he speaks, everyone cheers and hangs onto his every word. Everyone except for one man.

Baltimore Herald journalist E.K. Hornbeck (Gene Kelly) dares to speak out amongst the cheering crowd. While Brady stands on the stage during his welcoming ceremony, Hornbeck speaks an opposing opinion to all Brady has to say. This does not please Brady. Nor does it please the townspeople. Hornbeck doesn’t care. He likes stirring things up.

For the defense, attorney Henry Drummond (Spencer Tracy) comes to town. He quietly arrives on a bus with only Hornbeck to greet him. That is fine with Drummond.

On the way to his hotel, Drummond encounters people who do not want him in town. He also encounters a group of teenage boys happy to show their support for Cates.

Hand-drawn drawing. Grey clouds rain blue raindrops. A black sky background.
Storm
Kate Dorsey

A struggle with jury selection

When the trial starts, it is not easy to choose a jury. Some potential jury members are all too willing to state how much they support and believe in Brady. To make the process worse, Brady starts to pontificate in a way that could taint the jury.

Drummond will have none of this. He objects to Brady’s behavior. He objects to Brady being called Colonel without a military record. He objects to the sign above the courtroom doors telling people to read their bible. Fed up with all the bias, Drummond demands either take down the sign or else put up another sign telling people to read Darwin. This does not go over well.

Even Brady has a limit

After the jury selection, a rally led by Reverend Brown is held. He preaches about condemning people to Hell. Anyone who does not believe as he does is a sinner and is condemned to Hell. Anyone who supports these sinners are condemned to Hell. Even his own daughter, Rachel (Donna Anderson), is condemned to Hell because she supports Cates against her father’s wishes. To Hell they will all go.

It is at this point Brady sees things have gone too far. He speaks up, taking the wind out of the reverend’s sails. Brady and his wife, Sara (Florence Eldredge), console a distraught Rachel. This gives Rachel the feeling she can confide in them about Cates. Explain what was going on in his mind when he did what he did. She is engaged to Cates and has inside knowledge of his thoughts. Surely, she can make others understand. It is a decision Rachel comes to regret.

The trial takes a bad turn

In court Rachel is unexpectedly called to the stand. Brady brings up what Rachel has told him, but he uses it in a way other than Rachel intended. Rachel tries to explain Brady is twisting her words, but he will not listen. He verbally pounds at her on the stand to the point she breaks and falls apart. It is only Sara’s calling out to him that gets Brady to stop. When he does, he seems shaken. He was so caught up in his fervor, he did not realize what he was doing.

Seeing how upset Rachel is, Cates refuses to allow Drummond to cross-examine her.

With the prosecution rested, Drummond tries to call his own expert witnesses. They are all objected to by Brady and denied by the judge.

At this point Drummond loses his cool. He says the trial is rigged, something Judge Merle Coffey (Harry Morgan) takes great offense to. Of course, Judge Coffey is not going to admit how very accurate Drummond’s statement is.

Drummond says he is done with the case because of how it is being run. He would have probably stormed out except Judge Coffey puts a contempt charge on him. Drummond is forced to stay in town for one more night.

Hand-drawn drawing. Dice of different sizes and colors.
A Roll of the Dice
Kate Dorsey

Drummond takes control of the trial

It’s a good thing Drummond was forced to stay. That night, while people march and sing in the streets for the deaths of Cates and Drummond, Drummond figures out how to mount his defense.

The next day, Drummond calls Brady to the stand as an expert witness on the Bible. This causes some confusion as it is unorthodox to have the opposing council as a witness. Still, Brady, full of confidence, agrees to be a witness.

With Brady on the stand, Drummond reveals all the conflicting concepts of the Bible Brady follows so faithfully. Some of these contradictions and Brady’s non-answers make the gallery spectators laugh. This does not sit well with Brady.

It is also revealed while Brady is on the stand that the book Brady so strongly objects too, Darwin’s On the Origin of Species, is a book Brady has never read. In fact, he has never even opened it. Yet he calls it evil.

Drummond’s main point in his examination is the fact that God gave humans the power to think, yet people like Brady are trying to deny that right to Cates. Deny this right simply because Cates is not thinking what they want him to think. Brady would much rather have everyone follow him. Follow his beliefs and thought processes. Follow him because, according to Brady, God speaks to him, and only he speaks the word of God.

This is where everything unravels for Brady. Upset over how Drummond bested him and that the trial spectators laughed at him, Brady decides he is going to write a speech for the day the jury’s verdict comes in. It is a very long speech. A speech that is not heard.

After the verdict and punishment are announced (which Drummond says he is going to appeal), Brady insists on giving his speech. Except no one stays around to listen to it. All the spectators and media get up and move around. They talk to each other while Brady shouts his speech louder and louder until he dies.

In the final scene, Hornbeck is alone with Drummond. It is revealed Drummond does not disagree with religion as a whole, which is what is believed. What he disagrees with is how others apply religion and force it on people to do the same. There is nothing that says you cannot believe in Darwin and in God. They can go together, but they need to be allowed to go together, as Drummond does when he walks out with the Bible and Darwin’s On the Origin of Species under his arm.

The problems we are facing today

While Brady was on the witness stand, Drummond talked about the dangers of following only one way of thinking. It leads to banning books, fighting religions, and evil laws. These are all things we are facing now.

Today we have laws that force women to suffer and face bodily infections as they are denied life-saving treatment.

Politicians are calling for interracial and same-sex couples to lose their right to marry whom they love.

School boards are denying education, or even speaking, about people from the LGTBQ+ community.

Laws are being put into place denying transgender people the right to go to doctors and become who they know they are meant to be.

Books are being banned for the slightest infractions. Book primarily about LGBTQ+, race, and non-Christian experiences.

People are calling upon the United States, a country which prides itself on freedom of religion, to declare itself a country of one religion. A stance that will lead to discrimination of other religions, and laws put into place because of one religious set of beliefs. It would not be long before the different denominations of this one religion begin to battle, creating a war to determine whose is the one true religion.

To make everything worse, we have judges who no longer hide their bias. Judges who practically announce their decisions before a case is even before them, making it obvious their rulings are based on their own desires and personal opinions. Their rulings are no longer about the law or the people they have sworn to serve. It is about what they want, and what they want only. They leave their benches proud of the havoc they have created, while the rest of us are forced to deal with the consequences.

Hand-drawn drawing. The word "Status Quo" in red with rips of paper around it.
Changing Times
Kate Dorsey

The smallest detail can mean something

Throughout the entire film, Brady and his followers fanned themselves with fans promoting the local funeral parlor. I wondered if this was an intentional bit of foreshadowing or symbolism. It is also in the play, which leads me to think even more this was a symbolic detail.

I took this symbolism to mean that those who refuse to move forward and see other points of view are destined to be left behind, watching as their views die, far away from the views of the masses. Society, as a whole, will move on without them.

Drummond even has a line about how Brady has moved away from him, his old friend, by standing still. In the end, that is what always happens.

Those who are determined to stand still remain where they are. They become forgotten as others move, or they end up being seen in the worst possible light. It is up to all of us to determine whether or not we are going to be a person who moves forward or stands still.

This does not mean a person must agree with everything that happens in the world. No one is going to agree on everything all the time. But to stand still and not even acknowledge, learn, or let others come to their own conclusions and have their own freedoms hinders movement for all. While that may work in the short term, it won’t for long. People always break free. Once one person breaks free, others will follow. Those who refuse to grow will be left behind.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Doctor Blake Mysteries

The Brokenwood Mysteries

George Gently