Murder on the Orient Express

Last year I did comparisons of three film adaptations of Agatha Christie’s Death on the Nile in relation to the book. I have decided to do the same with Ms. Christie’s Murder on the Orient Express. This time, instead of one post, I will have separate posts for all four versions of Murder on the Orient Express. I will start with the book itself.

A train dining table with plate, flowers, and menu serve as the cover for the Agatha Christie novel Murder on the Orient Express.
Murder on the Orient Express
Agatha Christie

Hercule Poirot finds murder on the Orient Express

Detective Hercule Poirot was not supposed to be on the train. An emergency forced his need to travel, which is how he ended up on the surprisingly full Orient Express. The train ride is already expected to be a long journey, but it becomes even longer when the train gets stuck in a snowstorm. The snowstorm, however, is a minor inconvenience compared to the murder Poirot must solve.

The victim is a man named Ratchett. At least that is the name he has been going by. Cassetti is his true name. It is a well-known name as he is the man who got away with kidnapping and murdering a young girl: Daisy Armstrong. It is a tragic story that resulted in the deaths of many in Daisy’s life. Justice was not done.

Now Ratchett is dead, and everyone is a suspect. Poirot is called in to investigate. After searching for clues, Poirot interviews everyone.

Poirot interviews the suspects

First to be interviewed is Pierre Michel, a train conductor. He stepped away from his post for a while during the night, creating a window of time where the murderer could have moved about the train unseen.

Next is Hector MacQueen, Ratchett’s personal secretary. He knew Ratchett was receiving threatening letters. What he did not know was Ratchett’s true identity.

Edward Henry Masterman is interviewed after MacQueen. He was Ratchett’s valet and knew the exact steps Ratchett did every night before going to sleep.

Mrs. Caroline Hubbard does not appear to have an obvious connection to Ratchett, nor do the other remaining interviewees. Mrs. Hubbard is very loud and loves to talk. She is certain the murderer came through her sleeping berth.

The Swedish nurse, Greta Ohlsson, had an altercation with Ratchett not long before he was killed. Ratchett made it very clear what he thought of Greta’s age and appearance.

Princess Natalia Dragomiroff is an elderly woman. Despite it being known she was the godmother of Daisy Armstrong’s mother, it is doubtful she could have killed Ratchett.

Countess Helena Andrenyi and Count Rudolph Andrenyi claim the countess was asleep at the time of the murder. Her passport is questionable, though, as there is a noticeable smudge. This draws other parts of the Andrenyis' story into question.

Colonel John Arbuthnot uses MacQueen as an alibi for the murder. He is also evasive about how well he knows fellow passenger Mary Debenham.

Mr. Cyrus Hardman admits he is not who he says he is. During his interview he states it was his job to look after Ratchett during this trip. That clearly did not go well.

Antonio Foscarelli is the man railway director Bouc believes should have been spoken to first. Bouc does not trust Foscarelli because Foscarelli is Italian.

Mary Debenham has an answer for everything. No matter what Poirot asks, she knows what to say, which makes Poirot suspicious.

Poirot suspects Miss Debenham is lying about something. He saw her and Colonel Arbuthnot together before Poirot knew he would be on the train. Now they are denying their connection. Poirot wants to know why.

Finally, there is Hildegarde Schmidt, the princess’s maid. She is very protective of the princess.

With the help of Bouc and passenger Dr. Stavros Constantine, Poirot puts all he has learned together. Certain he knows what happened, Poirot gathers everyone to reveal the culprit.

Hand-drawn drawing. Books on a shelf.
Knowledge
Kate Dorsey

A well-known story

I was surprised at how slow and scattered this book felt. It was sometimes hard to follow what was going on. Part of this may be because I have seen different film versions and know the ending so well. Maybe I had a hard time following because I was reading other books at the same. It’s possible this book needs to be read on its own without distractions. I really don’t know.

What I do know is I am ready to watch the film versions again and compare them to the book. It will be fascinating to find out which film follows the book the closest.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Doctor Blake Mysteries

The Brokenwood Mysteries

George Gently